Wednesday, November 14, 2007

Club Nintendo Star Maker

When the spaceship affionda


session, at least occasionally, to the origins of this blog. Post
sc-sc-science today. Or how to remove always those twenty-five readers of this blog by Manzoni. Who wants to skip and can wait for hours of recreation: I can tell you is very long.
So do not wonder then ;-)))

Everything comes from the answer to the question: What is it and how the so-called gravity assist ? Well just yesterday

Rosetta had a second close encounter with Earth. I'm not talking nor my friend crashed to the ground or the crunchy roll (which, absurdly called Milan michetta ) unfortunately fell in the mud along with the salami: it is instead the probe launched in 2004 by ESA (European Space Agency) and to which Italy contributed to the establishment of special digital transponder on board. And before you ask, if it works and is flying is because not there I was.

The Rosetta mission is named after the stele that reveals the secrets of Egyptian hieroglyphics, because with this probe, we hope to uncover the secrets of comets, the oldest celestial bodies of the System Sunny.

operators have precisely maneuvered the probe to ensure that the Earth's gravitational attraction would provide a maximum thrust washer can, then you need to save fuel and arrive at your destination (ie the comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko in November 2014 four astronomical units away from the Sun Cheppalle, I get: 600 million km, so that is good?).

The moment of closest approach to Earth occurred November 13, 2007 at 21:57 CET as Rosetta in spite all'autovelox hurtled at a speed of 45,000 km / h (about 12.5 km / s) compared to Earth, flying over the Pacific Ocean, south-west of Chile, for un'altitudine di 5301 km. Sticazzi.

Comunque c’è una bellissima animazione qui .

L'incremento di energia acquisita aiuterà Rosetta ad attraversare una seconda volta la fascia di asteroidi, osservare Lutetia (il suo secondo obiettivo tra gli asteroidi) e infine effettuare l'incontro con la cometa.

Ma veniamo alla spiegazione: avete presente la fionda di Davide, che non era fatta da forcella ed elastici ma era piuttosto quella che nel medioevo veniva chiamata frombola ? Ecco, supponiamo di farla ruotare sopra la nostra testa e quindi di scagliare la pietra: essa partirà alla velocità cui stava ruotando (quando si dice partire per la tangen- ziale , Even at rush hour).
If I repeat the experiment by a speeding car (convertible, eh), the stone will have more speed than before that of the machine. The difficulty for us is the same, the increased speed at the cost of gasoline is wasted to make such a silly.

The thing is obvious to everyone, but who knows how it took the insight of the Italian scientist Giuseppe Colombo (every 500 years there is a Colombo with an intuition that changes history, and each point There is an intuition that Columbus used to stop the culprit) to understand that the same principle could apply the spacecraft, with significant fuel savings (aside: perhaps the Italian research funds cut them on purpose so much to us just three and a little snots' of string and go to Mars). And we can not bring on board all the fuel we want, because for every pound of weight should be sent into orbit to do half the oil tanker off the ground. What then, because what happens to oil lately, perhaps would agree as well.

Therefore, a probe that comes close to a planet will deviate from its trajectory due to the severity of it and moves away along a direction different from that of arrival:






If the planet was still, as long as the probe approaches would accelerate, then slow down and finally it should be at a rate equal to that approach. Just like when we overcome a bike off, then slow down and speed up down the next hill, and then left with the same speed at which we had arrived. But now, yet it moves, as he said another Italian genius, and in appropriate conditions the probe can be run at a speed greater than that with which they approached. Speed \u200b\u200bthat comes from the "push" provided by the planet, and is without consuming fuel. So the planet "grab" the probe, providing raises energy: By analogy with the example of stone, this mechanism is called a gravity assist.

But if nothing is created nor destroyed, although there is no meal aggratis , which has consequences for what? Answer: The planet slows its motion. At least in theory: do not think we will end up sooner or later cause the arrest: a case of ' huge difference between the mass of the probe and that of the planet, so it slows down in a negligible we can safely say that it continues to move as if nothing had happened (although the idea of \u200b\u200bsfruculiare even just the motion of planets and comets in the ass to those of astrologers and charlatans with their outlandish theories about the influence of celestial bodies, I am not a little amusement). A bit 'like trying to stop a truck to 130 km / h with an ascent of 40 km / h on the bumper: the ball bounces back to 170 km / h. Of course, to your face.

And yet to get the shooting.

Wednesday, November 7, 2007

Shaving Pubic Hair Before Internal

Who vo 'crush and who vo' raw


Should I create a new post, but as they say in L'Aquila, I nun te ' (I do not take [us]). Then I do a post che parla del blog: ma un blog che parla del blog cos'è, un meta-blog? OK ho capito, sto divagando. Ma andiamo con ordine (quello che segue è un melange di commenti e di messaggi ricevuti in privato, in cui molti si riconosceranno):

Fase 1 : Mi registro su Splinder ed inizio a commentare i blog altrui
"Perché non apri anche tu un blog?" (non mi pare il caso)
"Scrivi bene: dovresti metter su un blog" (poi non vi lamentate però)

Fase 2 : Creo un blog, dopo molti scervellamenti su significato, titolo, chisiamo e dadoveveniamo
"Perché l'hai aperto su Blogspot?" (ma porc...)
"In your blog I can not comment!" (Here I'm really sorry)
"I can not even log in!" (Apper)
"Did you already have an account Splinder, it was easy, I do not understand"

Step 3: Coming the anonymous, even if someone actually does so to be recognized
"Why allow anonymous comments on?"
"I warned you this would happen!" (It is true, had done)

Step 4: Allow comments only to those registered
"If I register to comment hope you're cool!"
"Finally, it was the only thing to do!"
"So I just read, without comment" (scrounger ,-D)

Step 5: readmit anyone comment.
come full lyrics. He thought for a bit 'and then delete them.

Step 6: Protests one hand clapping hand
"I thought you were a lens!" (You know it sucks, you would see all the internal organs)
"You're worse than a death's head" (please?)
"You did well, democracy does not mean to make your home comfortable in others"
"If you delete the comments is not a real blog! "

Step 7: Announcement I close the blog
"Wait, do not be hasty!"
"Do not give up, quit would be a shame"
"It is a loss of intelligence "(no exaggeration)
" You get conditioned like that? "

Step 8: I open even on Splinder, practically a sister blog (but not close Blogspot)
" Pirlone, I told you so far now "(I was pirlone?)
" Oh, finally, here is much better! "
" You're a shit squacquera "(I miss)
" Why did not you notice? "(but I was not already married ? mah ...)
Archimedes are a bast and rdello "(with e)

Step 9: you fit it in, stage nine, with your comments.

Tuesday, October 30, 2007

Cystic Fibrosis Facts

talks like magnet!


Sometimes it happens, here at work, could not resist the temptation (perhaps bothers) to correct others when they are talking to ... let '... English? Well, not so. Italian? If you want to call it Italian! The fact is that hearing certain expressions in my brain triggers the same effect as fingernails scratching a blackboard: many here are filled her mouth with big words that only have the habit of English, but which are real horrors language.

Examples: "That transmitter must be Delivered by Friday." Understand the mechanism? Delivery = delivery, and mean delivered. COCK AND THEN WHY
NON DICI CONSEGNATO?

Ancora: "I test elettrici sono schedulati per metà aprile". To schedule (sarebbe "mettere in calendario") = potremmo dire sono previsti per, o no?

E infine, la peggiore di tutte: "Sulla riuscita delle prove termiche, siamo abbastanza confidenti ". To be confident = essere fiduciosi. Quando dicono così, invariabilmente rispondo: " della Polizia?"

Ma chi parla così non è nemmeno capace di cogliere l'ironia, nemmeno quando dici loro la classica: "Mi scuso se la mia ignoranza non è pari alla Sua, ma..."

Insomma, Nanni Moretti dice in un suo film che “le parole sono importanti” , e io condivido fermamente quest’affermazione, ma Nanni Moretti è Nanni Moretti, se invece lo dico io passo per un pignolo saccente.

Thursday, October 25, 2007

Towel Dispenser Motion Sensor How

Archimedes was an Enlightened


Anni fa (era il 2004), partecipai per la prima volta in vita mia ad un blog. Era uno dei blog de La Repubblica, e dopo un periodo in cui avevo usato il mio vero nome come nick, cominciai a "firmarmi" Archimede. Per spiegare brevemente perché, dirò che è stato il mio soprannome in famiglia quando ero ragazzino.
La maggior parte degli "avventori", dato il quotidiano, era di sinistra (qualunque cosa ormai significhi), mentre non mancavano i disturbatori di destra, alcuni (pochi) intelligenti, altri (molti) dei veri idioti.
Notammo tutti che se si cazzeggiava, il blog scorreva tranquillo, con qualche critica di fancazzismo a spese dei datori di lavoro da parte dei destrorsi. Ma spesso, quando i commenti nel blog prendevano una piega "seria", in cui si intavolava un dibattito costruttivo su grandi problemi, allora imperversavano i trolls bombardando il blog di insulti, cazzate, testi di canzoni , brani copiaincollati da Wikipedia, ecc. ecc.
In particolare ricordo a day that was the anniversary of a tragic accident (I'm missing but if it were the Moro kidnapping or the killing of the Bologna train station, or the Brescia: we must sadly admit that we are full of similar episodes) was in fact quietly "talking "among bloggers, each with his personal memories of that day and what had meaning for everyone, at some point when there they are: trolls burst, with the usual tactics, fucked up the speech and" possession "of the fact blog.
Objective achieved, since the discussion was never resumed.
But I come to the crucial point: annoyed da quell'evento, postai un commento in cui invocavo l'intervento censorio del giornalista gestore di quel blog. Apriti cielo.
Immediatamente uno di questi trolls, rivelando una cultura ed una proprietà di linguaggio fino ad allora insospettabili, mi diede del dittatore, sostenendo che da un illuminato come Archimede non si aspettava tanto oscurantismo.
In effetti, còlto dall'ira, non ci avevo pensato, e la cosa mi colpì abbastanza pur avvertendo che avevo comunque ragione e che l'obiezione era una scusa per spostare di fatto il problema principale.
Pochi giorni fa su questo blog - il mio blog - qualcuno ha copiaincollato un paio di canzoni di Baglioni, così, senza che ci entrassero una cippa col topic proposto, per quanto scherzoso se volete (e senza firmarsi, chiaro). Le ho lasciate per un po', ho riflettuto, poi le ho cancellate.
Apriti cielo again: di nuovo, accuse di essere poco trasparente.
A questo punto ho fatto una riflessione: non sono fatto per gestire un blog che non sia moderato.
A scuola facevo temi di Italiano stringati (che se vogliamo è l'antitesi del tema, che deve essere lungo) ma fossi mai uscito fuori tema once . That must be why I hate off topic.
So, if a blog should also be open to comments as silly, the easy courage of anonymity, this toy I do not want it anymore. Obviously not made for me.
Perhaps that lighting is not that I would pretend to look like.
Or some people behind the excuse of democracy, they want to do whatever the fuck they like (but here we are in the House of Mica bail!).
Moreover the toy is mine and I can do what I want.
'd rather go back to comment (in theme) to the others.
Goodbye, is almost always a pleasure.
This blog will self-destruct within a few days.