How Do You Work A Polaroid Camera

Metrology

Here is a summary of the measures used in the Trentino area. For the scope
Tyrolean do not know if they are equally valid.

I. Surface measurements:
- the rain (in Trent 3382 sqm);
- field;
- the acre (in use in Bolzano);

II. Volume measures: a.
for cereals:
- a bushel (modium, at Trent about 170 liters);
- the bushel (starium, sextarium, approximately 21.3 liters = 1 bushel 8 bushels);
- the stariolum (maybe 3 stariola = 1 bushel);
- the Galeta (probably 5 galete = 1 somma, quindi 1 galeta = 31,7 litri)
b. per il vino:
- il carro (plaustrum, a Trento 628 litri);
- la castelata (forse pari al carro);
- l’orna (urna) o concio (a Trento 78,5 litri; a Termeno 81,6 litri)
c. per l’olio:
- la galeta (forse 5 galete = 1 moggio, e allora 1 galeta = circa 34 litri).
- Lo staio (3 staia = 1 galeta).

III. Misure di peso:
- la libbra (a Trento 0,336 kg)

come testi di riferimento, per eventuali curiosi, Manuale di metrologia, ossia, Misure, pesi e monete in uso attualmente e anticamente presso tutti i popoli di Angelo Martini or Beschreibung zu Alte und Lokale nichtmetrische Gewicht und ihre Masse und Grossen nach metrischem System of Wilhelm Rottleuthner .
Indication of Interest were also Tridentinische Urbar of Schneller on pp. 140-162.

(information from Trentino Documents in the archives of Innsbruck (1145-1284) , edited by Cristina Belloni Autonomous Province of Trento. Superintendence for the archival and library material, 2004)

Adenomyosis And Omega 3

Electrosmog yes or no: third part

So how do we know that the trellis in front of home, school, office transmits within the limits? Unfortunately we can only do so much, why bother before the ARPA should have reasonable assurance that these limits are exceeded, and who can give us that certainty unless a sophisticated (and expensive) measuring equipment? Moreover it seems that the ARPA mobile operators a warning before about the day when those checks will be carried out, negating the element of surprise. A little 'as if the Financial Police warned that people would first check the books.

For this reason, at the request of a blogger friend of long standing which had placed a repeater on the roof of the building in front, long ago I built an economical but sufficiently accurate that could carry out such measures. Nothing brilliant, not invention, is clear: a simple kit to buy and fit within a couple of nights free.

course, exist to much more expensive, but not necessarily that are more sophisticated: scrolling specifications declared by the manufacturers, it discovers that it can lead to a tolerance (the error in percent measurement made) up to 10%, and sincerely from one instrument to several hundred euro expect a bit 'more. Probably parte del prezzo è giustificato da tutta una serie di funzioni accessorie quali la possibilità di registrare la media delle letture lungo più ore di funzionamento, la possibilità di interfacciamento al computer e altre frocerie del genere. In fondo a me serviva uno strumento semplice, che facesse una sola cosa, possibilmente bene.
È lo strumento che vedete nelle foto, con il quale mi sono divertito in questi giorni a misurare il campo emesso ad alcune decine di metri di distanza dai ripetitori della mia zona.

Per la cronaca, sul terrazzo dell’attico del mio amico rilevammo valori piuttosto oltre il limit, even if there is to say that the duration of these "peaks" was always few minutes. It would have been appropriate to make an average at least four hours long, but I had all this time to lose, I did not much stand there and put up with those emissions. So I left the instrument on loan to his friend, who took over for a few days always elevated. When they arrived and warned the ARPA (later time) with their instruments, strangely that day was all right. Hence the suspicion
... There must also be said that the law excludes relief from balconies and terraces, so the bottom was only to blame in der place.

As you can see from the photos I post, as it happens two measurements that I made I have found a higher level of emissions, even if just to tell the truth (6.6 V / m below the former water tower water, and 6.9 V / m close to my hardware vendor of choice for my achievements). Also to be honest, we must recognize that two samples are a little 'just statistically speaking, the equipment may also enter other noise sources such as television signals.

while taking these measures, taking the instrument the left hand and the camera with his right hand to document the results, those who passed were the faces and comments that ranged from the fun (anvedi 'I'm crazy, but that that which has the odd mobile phone) to the worried (but who is, but he is prepared to 'an attack?).

However, in principle, I think we can rest easy. The towers have risen in recent years, and although this may seem paradosale not a bad thing because it creates more cells that transmit base (hence the name of the phone), so you need a less power to cover the territory. I would worry more about the mobile phone ear, so to speak. Be brief (among other things should cost) and use the headset as possible. I conclude with a little 'based on the anecdotal experiences, just to understand what you may have in extreme cases.

1) while serving with the Navy (oh yes), one day we did the transmission tests on board a cruiser with a highly directive antenna (the speech of the radiation lobe, but this time we could say similar to the beam light of a torch) I saw with my own eyes a gull run too close bold pull-up to this antenna, and then immediately drop stone dead on the flight deck, literally cooked.

2) Also in the Navy, a day that happened to all those who had stationed a little 'more than usual in the fax room, his eyes burned unbearably, with strong eyes.
Outside the window of this room, very close, rose from the garden below a large antenna for telecommunications, like a flagpole for the flag. It turned out that that day the power was inadvertently trasmisione increased, and that the burning of the eyes was due to the generation of micro-electric currents induced in the tear film, which has a certain natural conductivity.

3) The company where I worked previously built radar, than to have an idea that we see running at airports to prevent the irradiation of the surrounding houses and the same employees, usually these radars is inhibited by software a particular sector (think of a slice of cake), where is the slice (the people), the radar during his tour automatically turns off while in the rest of the cake (the open countryside, sea, uninhabited areas, etc..) radar emits radio waves. Well, one day was accidentally reversed this mechanism, and what we noticed any "brushed" the radar for us, it was the "flicker" of PC monitors and above the spontaneous ignition (per il tempo della spazzolata) delle luci al neon sul soffitto, senza che nessuno toccasse l’interruttore. Dopo furibonde telefonate ed un improvviso sciopero spontaneo, finalmente si decisero a notare l’errore.

Al di là di questi casi limite , in genere la radiofrequenza in cui siamo nostro malgrado immersi non è così pericolosa (mi riservo qualche dubbio su Radio Vaticana e Radio Maria, ma d’altronde c’è da capirli: la lieta novella va diffusa a qualunque costo ).
Inoltre, anche se andassimo a vivere su una remota isola del pacifico, non sfuggiremmo alle “fotografie” radar con cui i satelliti artificiali bersagliano continuamente la Earth, so let's not worry too much about the towers for mobile phones.

This series of posts has addressed the issue to electrosmog high frequency, but we anticipated that, weather permitting, I'll be facing the same issue on the front of the bass (towers for power lines, electrical systems, transformers on standby, appliances, alarm clocks, etc...)

END

Dog Vomiting Mucus And Blood

Electrosmog yes or no: part

We were left with the question about what were the legal limits of radio frequency emissions, and how to verify that they are respected.

As mentioned in previous posts, in Italy the law No. 381 del 3/11/1998 (entrata in vigore il 2/1/1999) stabilisce all’art. 4 comma 2 il limite massimo che non si dovrebbe mai superare per un’ esposizione prolungata (viene specificato un tempo uguale o maggiore a quattro ore): esso è di 6 Volt/metro (sei Volt per metro).
Indipendentemente quindi dalla frequenza emessa, si considera l’intensità di campo elettrico associato a tali emissioni. Anche se l’autorità competente in materia (l’ARPA, Agenzia Regionale Protezione Ambientale) afferma che il cittadino è tutelato da questa legge, avete mai visto qualcuno che controlli periodicamente queste emissioni? Io no. Non ci si deve perciò stupire se, dopo una prima rigorosa verifica da parte degli enti preposti, la potenza possa venire alterata abusivamente dai gestori per aumentare l’area di copertura, dato che ovviamente ciò costa molto meno che installare un nuovo traliccio (evitando quindi proteste e problemi vari con la gente, che non vuole il ripetitore però si lamenta se non c’è campo ).

Al riguardo poi di questi fatidici 6 V/m c’è in giro un’ignoranza raccapricciante, specialmente su internet può risultare complicato discernere un sito con informazioni corrette da uno contenente bestialità: mi è capitato dunque di leggere 6 Watts per meter (thus confusing the Volt with Watt). Apart from the fact that if anything we should talk about watts per square meter , without the necessary equivalences this value is in fact tantamount to 47.5 Volt / m , that is a limit to eight times higher than allowed by law. The Volt is one thing, another Watt. Otherwise there would be no need for two different units. Yet no one would dream of confusing the chili with the meters. Perhaps the only one who could succeed with its dialectical nature but also conciliatory, to bring together the two different sizes, can only be him Watt er Volt neurons. (Okay, 'a little' healthy faffing of pre-election there is, come on).

Elsewhere it is stated that this measure should be taken one meter from the antenna , ignoring that the electromagnetic field decreases with the square of the distance (if a meter measuring a tot, two meters will have tot / 4 , three meters will have tot / 9, still a meter and read tot/16, and so on). We need instead to know the ASR field in our living room, or worse in the bedroom where we sleep for eight hours (seh, maybe!), In other contexts is even said that you need to get a metal plate one square meter and connect it to a voltmeter to be read. Everything will get confused if you're not in the field, but I assure you that if we ask the Wizard of lights Arcella maybe we would not bullshit.

In some forum I have also taken undue alarm, but as in any hospital is laid out a good sign that prohibits to turn the phone on, to avoid interference with the sophisticated medical equipment (LOL, see post on phones in an aircraft) then maybe it comes out and - surprise! - You notice any of these repeaters virtually front of the hospital, 24-hour course on 24 and radiating power of some more of our small cell. Not to mention the repeaters placed close to child .

The law, however, is just more cautious about these and other special sites: the minimum distance plants it increased up to 50 meters , and as said before is easy to calculate that the emitted field will be worth 2500 times less than not to a meter away from the antenna.

And for those of our building repeaters that we have indignantly refused condominium at the meeting, only to vederceli placed on the roof of the building in front ? The owners of the building have accepted rimborso fornito loro dalla compagnia telefonica, tanto a loro che je frega... Anche se può sembrare strano ai più, chi starà peggio sarete voi e tutto il circondario, meno che… essi stessi!

Infatti come si vede in figura, il lobo di radiazione (tra due righe lo spiego) di queste antenne non è omnidirezionale, cioè non irradia ugualmente in tutte le direzioni: non servirebbe a niente disperdere potenza verso l’alto. Un po’ come quelle insulse lampade da giardino fatte a palla, la cui luce parte inutilmente anche in direzione di lontane galassie. Invece queste antenne sono fatte in modo da focalizzare l’emissione in una direzione preference (wide horizontal and narrow vertically, like a sort of fig leaf of india) who is receiving very little in the signal. Think of the light beam of the headlights in the dark, designed to cover an area located a few meters in front of the car and pointed slightly down, if you were to serve this light to see a coin just below the bumper, there will do little good, right? The same with the repeaters, that "light up" the whole area around which are placed (but who covers the area below where they are placed? Another repeater not far from there, but that's another story. afraid eh?).

But Archimedes, you say, went through another episode without telling us what we can do to see if the trellis in front of our house (or school of my children, or in front of the office where I spend eight hours or more) to provide or not within the legal limits.

You are right, but today I overflowed: the following post it sooner than you might think.

Power Analysis Calculator

world Goswin, monaco

I thought that this subject always edited by Giuseppe Albertoni, could be interesting.
http://www.emscuola.org/labdocstoria/storiae/Dossier/Dossier01b/indice.htm

Texas Souvenirs Unlimited

of the fourteenth century coins in the '300 Bolzano

I must point out this page written by Albertoni on the coins used in the '300 Bolzano.
http://www.emscuola.org/labdocstoria/Pubblicazioni/Trecento/capC03.htm

The entire publication from which the above chapter is taken can be helpful, providing a rather large daily life in the Bolzano Three hundred. It 'a publication of Labdocstoria for use by schools, so very easy and accessible, but still, in some versi, interessante
http://www.emscuola.org/labdocstoria/Pubblicazioni/Trecento/indice.htm

Mount Blade Wedding Dance Hakkinda

from singular to plural

Una piccola nota ad un plurale che mi lasciava perplessa: quello di "staio".
Ho fatto una piccola ricerca e ho risolto i miei dubbi.
Il termine staio ha ben tre possibilità di plurale, legate al significato che il termine assume.
Quando con staio si intende l'unità di misura di capacità per aridi, il plurale è staia .
Quando invece con il termine si indica il recipiente per la misura di uno staio (in legno, cilindrico e a doghe cerchiate) il plurale è stai .
Quando ci si riferisce, per estensione, alla superficie of land needed to sow a bushel of wheat, the plural is bushels, but was once also used staiora " to them for these works so egregious was donated by the public land for each of two staiora " (Machiavelli, Discourses on Livy, 24)