then ... Referring to the previous, in which tumors were associated with plant and its here, these are the exploitation of some political parties that pretend to environmental and instead they end up playing into the hands of the worst destroyers of the environment and try to explain why:
the LNG terminals are nothing more than the "lungs", those who understand (those who used a gas cylinder should have already figured out) mean that the liquid methane (or LPG, which is always liquid) steps for decompression as a gas, heating it a bit 'to ensure that the water may solidify in the air, that's all.
No chemical reactions, no burning wind, the only damage is that there may be some loss of methane but does nothing more than what happens on the stove at home ( or when you have eaten too many beans, I would add ).
The only downside is that maybe you can bother to see the huge tafanari near the beach, but I say you are in Bagnoli to complain of an LNG terminal? Especially since more than half of these plants would offshore. I would give more autonomy gas terminals on the gas market and avoid all the problems that Putin turning off the tap and reducing the costs to the final consumer, namely us. The current situation forces us instead to convert coal-fired power plant that, even with all the necessary precautions, there remains much more polluting than natural gas.
Well, I hope I have helped to resolve some 'fog concerning these facilities.
0 comments:
Post a Comment